Justin Trudeau’s $900 Million Scandal: Canadians Deserve Answers

Today, Justin Trudeau will testify at the Finance Committee and Canadians will have an opportunity to judge his answers for themselves.

Canadians have a lot of questions about Justin Trudeau’s $900 million scandal and they deserve clear answers.

If Justin Trudeau can’t say no when asked a straightforward question, Canadians will have no choice but to conclude that the answer is yes.

Did Justin Trudeau or his office have any contact with WE before handing them a billion-dollar contract?
Was anyone in the Prime Minister’s office aware of WE’s proposals or helping to advance them?
Was WE given a massive contract because of their close ties to the Trudeau and Morneau families and the Liberal Party?
Did Justin Trudeau not think that Canadians would find out that WE had paid members of his family more than half a million dollars?
Was Sophie Trudeau paid for her WE trip to London in March?
Has Justin Trudeau’s family received other financial benefits from WE?
Are there other companies with financial relationships with the Trudeau family that receive government contracts?
Did the Prime Minister know that a member of the Finance Minister’s family worked for WE Charity?
Has the Prime Minister been involved in any contracts, grants or contributions that WE Charity received since 2015?
Did anyone warn the Prime Minister about the many conflicts of interest in this case?
Is there a conflict of interest filter at cabinet? Can the Prime Minister describe it?
Given he’s already been found guilty of breaking ethics laws twice before, has Justin Trudeau actually read the Conflict of Interest Act?
Does the Prime Minister believe that the meetings and discussions the Kielburgers had with various Liberal ministers and their staff are a contravention of the Lobbying Act?
Has the Prime Minister ever read the Lobbying Act?
Will Justin Trudeau fully cooperate with any RCMP investigation into his latest scandal?
Will Justin Trudeau fully waive cabinet confidences so that the Ethics Commissioner can investigate his third ethics violation?